Re: mde always different
From: TC (aatcbbtccctc_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/04/05
- Next message: TC: "Re: mde always different"
- Previous message: Some Bloke: "Re: Re: I have been asked to leave the company for having spotted serious security breaches"
- In reply to: George Nicholson: "Re: mde always different"
- Next in thread: TC: "Re: mde always different"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Feb 2005 19:01:14 -0800
No. The reason is that MDBs and MDEs contain unallocated buffers whose
content is determined by whatever was in RAM at the time. It is nothing
to do with "encryption" - in the proper sense (ie. the application of
RC4 and DES to the file content), or in the sense that I suspect you
are using it (ie. the translation of source code into a tokenized
form).
HTH,
TC
George Nicholson wrote:
> encryption
>
> --
> George Nicholson
>
> Remove 'Junk' from return address.
>
>
> "loris corazza via AccessMonster.com" <forum@AccessMonster.com> wrote
in
> message news:7a213b24be044569a899c431bd480c4d@AccessMonster.com...
> > please,
> > can you explain me why every mde are generated different from the
> > previous?
> >
> > Try this sequence:
> > 1) Take a .mdb and generate the correspondig .mde
> > 2) Rename the .mde
> > 3) Generate one more time the .mde from the same .mdb
> > 4) Analyze the binary contents of the two .mde, you'll see
> > they are completely different.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> > thanks
> >
> > --
> > Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com
- Next message: TC: "Re: mde always different"
- Previous message: Some Bloke: "Re: Re: I have been asked to leave the company for having spotted serious security breaches"
- In reply to: George Nicholson: "Re: mde always different"
- Next in thread: TC: "Re: mde always different"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]