Re: Démarrer une synchronisation

"PAT" <antipubl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:epeuWm$LHHA.2456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Depuis septembre, je gére une table répliquée (en raison d'un
portable) . Tout allait bien, jamais d'erreur.
Je viens de m'apercevoir pourtant que la réplication n'est pas
parfaite. La base répliquée semble avoir toujours reçue les maj de
la base maitre, alors que la base maitre n'a pas reçue toutes les
infos de la base répliquée. Je n'ai jamais eu de message
d'erreurs, pas de pbe de conflit à résoudre.

Je pense que mon soucis vient du fait que je pense avoir utilisé
la mauvaise méthode( synchro directe), alors que je devrais
utiliser la synchronisation indirecte.

Un réplica maitre qui dépose les modifs dans un fichier temp, le
réplica du portable fait de même, et quand le portable se connecte
sur le réseau, on demande la synchro et chaque réplica fait sa maj
avec le fichier temp de l'autre. Si j'ai tout compris ce doit être
comme ça. Est-ce que quelqu'un a déjà utilisé ce principe ? Quand
j'ouvre la synchoniseur de microsoft l'aide n'est pas très
explicite.

I don't speak French, so I ran this through a translator. It came up
with this:

Since September, I gére a retorted table (because of a portable).
All was well, never of error. I have just seen me however that the
replication is not perfect. The retorted base seems to have always
received the maj of the base maitre, whereas the base maitre did
not receive all the infos retorted base. I never had error
message, not pbe of conflict to be solved. I think that my concern
comes owing to the fact that I think of having used the bad method
(synchro direct), whereas I should use indirect synchronization. A
réplica maitre which deposits the modifs in a file temp, the
réplica of the portable makes in the same way, and when the
portable is connected on the network, one asks for the synchro and
each réplica makes its maj with the file temp of the other. If I
very included/understood it must be like that. Did somebody
already use this principle? When I open the synchonisor of
Microsoft the assistance is not very explicit.

I'm not at all clear on what this says, to be honest. It looks like
you are using a laptop (portable) and want to synch with your design
master (réplica maitre). You are using direct replication, but it's
not clear to me what kind of connection you are using. If you are
connected over a wired LAN (10Mbps or higher), direct should be just
fine.

Indirect replication is needed only over a WAN or the Internet or
over wireless, where the bandwidth is very limited and the
connection unreliable.

It appears that you have some kind of conflicts that are causing
problems, so I assume you have replication errors in your conflicts.
These need to be fixed. Whatever the error, you have to rectify the
problem. If the error is heing caused by "dead replicas" (ones that
have been improperly copied/moved and overwritten or deleted) then
you need to get those dead replicas removed from the replica set by
attempting a synch with them. If there's "live replica" of the same
name in the same location, you'll have to temporarily rename it and
then attempt a synch with it. You may have to do this many times --
as many times as there are rows for that filename in the
MSysReplicas table.

I hope this helps. I'll do my best with the language barrier.

You don't speak German, by any chance? That I can read, though I
don't write it well.

--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
.