Re: New to Replication - Need Help




On 8/5/06 18:57, in article Xns97BD8DED46380f99a49ed1d0c49c5bbb2@xxxxxxxxx,
"David W. Fenton" <XXXusenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"larsdennert@xxxxxxxxx" <larsdennert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1147107769.867911.107000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

Probably the copy process isn't closing the file properly and
either has it locked open or not flushed before disconnecting.

Well, that would assume that you're opening the same file that
you're copying.

If remote users are term-served in, why not just have them make
the changes locally?

Well, I can see having a TS connection being used to initialize the
installation on a remote machine. It's a clever idea that had never
occurred to me.

Why do you even need term serve to just copy a file, which is the
wrong way to implement the process anyway? They should either do
the above or have a permanent replica installed on their machine
that gets synch'd.

My reading is that the TS connection is what is used to do the
installation onto the local machine. That would actually make a
great deal of sense, particularly for users who can't rely on being
able to connect to the Terminal Server for long periods of time, but
still need to work. As long as they can sometimes connect, they'd be
able to set up the remote machine with its local replica and then
work disconnected.

The big issue for me is the fact that the thing is not split,
apparently. That's disastrous in the long run, without question.

Hi David, lars' comment is one that I've also been considering. As I said
in my o.p I'm a complete novice when it comes to replication (and I'm not
that experienced in Access to be honest :-) but if the remote users are
connecting to the office's public folder via Term Serve, then why have it
replicated at all? Why can't they simply use the P:\ drive database
directly?

After quizzing a few people at work today it would seem the replication was
set up in the belief that access is not a mulit-user application and by
having copies installed onto remote machines (then synching) this would
enable more than one person to use the database without any 'read only
nonsense' (a direct quote).

I have also since found out more details of the *actual* bottleneck. Once
one of the remote users has installed, used & synched, it would seem that
the database is then unavailable until the parent folder is deleted from the
Term Serve directory, so the remote users are having to liaise with each
other to arrange who is going to use it & then liaise with the company IT
department to delete the parent folder? So it seems Lars is right - the copy
process isn't closing the file properly and locking it open. So if I knew
how to sort that I'd have a temporary fix while I sort the other problems
:-)

Regards

Jason
___

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: LSA vs LSP GUI on Vista/2008?
    ... I mentioned WMI because Joe had suggested it in this thread, I will instead post to WMI group about it. ... I was assuming you could remote a call to any class that's part of the base .NET Framework on the remote machine. ... the app that uses the COM object does not need the Admin privileges. ... you need the admin privileges only during the installation. ...
    (microsoft.public.platformsdk.security)
  • Re: LSA vs LSP GUI on Vista/2008?
    ... remote machines without any installation. ... Regarding writing a WMI provider, and assuming this provider would be ... provider to a remote machine at run time and then uninstall it when the ... only works with Admin rights - unlike DCOM that can work without Admin ...
    (microsoft.public.platformsdk.security)
  • Re: ADAM dsamain high cpu
    ... instance or on a newly installed replica? ... the ADAM instance event log? ... Some things that can cause high CPU usage are: ... installation of a new replica ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • PSExec vs Task Scheduler
    ... Can someone explain/clarify any differences between launching processes on ... a remote machine using psexec with/without specific user credentials? ... If I stage the installation file to the remote machine (a Wise created .exe ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.cmdprompt.admin)
  • Re: New to Replication - Need Help
    ... either has it locked open or not flushed before disconnecting. ... installation onto the local machine. ... able to set up the remote machine with its local replica and then ...
    (microsoft.public.access.replication)

Quantcast