Re: My Replication Design Question
From: Cheval (NoSpam.Ask_at_ForEmail.com)
Date: 02/20/05
- Previous message: Aaron James via AccessMonster.com: "Re: My Replication Design Question"
- In reply to: Aaron James via AccessMonster.com: "Re: My Replication Design Question"
- Next in thread: Aaron James via AccessMonster.com: "Re: My Replication Design Question"
- Reply: Aaron James via AccessMonster.com: "Re: My Replication Design Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:00:44 GMT
Ok fair enough. That'll work as long as there is only two networks. How do
you handle changes to the same record in both networks?
MS Replication is Microsoft Office Access Replication.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Aaron James via AccessMonster.com" <forum@AccessMonster.com> wrote in
message news:0bdc5c549b1243919738f839b6452056@AccessMonster.com...
Well I actually do depend on synchronization between the design master and
the replica to decide what has changed and what can automatically be
updated versus what needs manually reconciled. Initially I thought about
creating my own replication scheme, but deemed that too much effort and
time versus this modified scheme I came up with. Granted everything seems
to work though.
What is MS Replication?
Thanks for the suggestions though.
*ponders the length of a fortnight.. :)
-- Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com
- Previous message: Aaron James via AccessMonster.com: "Re: My Replication Design Question"
- In reply to: Aaron James via AccessMonster.com: "Re: My Replication Design Question"
- Next in thread: Aaron James via AccessMonster.com: "Re: My Replication Design Question"
- Reply: Aaron James via AccessMonster.com: "Re: My Replication Design Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|