Re: Like
- From: "Douglas J. Steele" <NOSPAM_djsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 06:59:56 -0500
"David W. Fenton" <XXXusenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9B8CBCDECE762f99a49ed1d0c49c5bbb2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Douglas J. Steele" <NOSPAM_djsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:Oa1hJRPcJHA.4072@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
"HAVING (((tblHouse.[Consignee Client Name]) Like '*TO*' And
(tblHouse.[Consignee Client Name]) Like '*ORDER*') AND (
Uh, those look like WHERE clauses. HAVING should be used only on
summarized values (SUM, MAX, FIRST, etc.).
You're right. That's what happens when you only look at the problem section
of the query, not its intent.
--
Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
(no e-mails, please!)
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Multi-select no selection made - display all records
- Next by Date: Re: Group results into groups of 10
- Previous by thread: Re: Like
- Next by thread: combine notes in separate rows...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|