Re: SQL
From: paul (paul_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/14/04
- Next message: Mo: "RE: Setting EXCEL columns data type"
- Previous message: solex: "Re: Setting EXCEL columns data type"
- In reply to: solex: "Re: SQL"
- Next in thread: solex: "Re: SQL"
- Reply: solex: "Re: SQL"
- Reply: John Nurick: "Re: SQL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 06:19:05 -0700
Dan, thanks thats useful. I do expect more than 5 concurrent read only users
but less than 5 read/write users. in total more than 5 if that makes sense.
the size of the dBase will be less than 10MB.
the data model is not complicated at all.
ive already split my dbase in to a be-fe configuration and limited the
number of users that have the fe. ideally, i want upto 30 read only users and
5 or so read write users, will access cope?
"solex" wrote:
> Paul,
> It depends on your requirements. IMO, you should use SQL Server if you
> expect to have a large amount of data >250 MB, have a complex data model
> and/or you expect to have more the 5 concurrent users.
> Dan
>
>
> "paul" <paul@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3E63F631-C469-4C77-BE38-A0BDE841E32D@microsoft.com...
> > ive been told that creating a database using SQL is far better than using
> > access. can an access database be easily converted to SQL and if so what
> are
> > the benefits?
>
>
>
- Next message: Mo: "RE: Setting EXCEL columns data type"
- Previous message: solex: "Re: Setting EXCEL columns data type"
- In reply to: solex: "Re: SQL"
- Next in thread: solex: "Re: SQL"
- Reply: solex: "Re: SQL"
- Reply: John Nurick: "Re: SQL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
