Re: Networking
- From: "aaron.kempf@xxxxxxxxx" <aaron.kempf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
and for the record, I usually implement DNS C Names in order to use
pointers for all my apps.
Then instead of changing the connection string (IN ONE PLACE) I just
change the DNS pointer.
now _THAT_ is an enterprise level idea!
-Aaron
On May 15, 1:07 am, "Arvin Meyer [MVP]" <a...@xxxxx> wrote:
Linking an ADP is no different than linking an MDB to SQL-Server or any
other RDBM for front-end changes. It isn't easier at all since if one moves
the server, because one needs to build a new DSN or rewrite the connection
strings, and one only needs to relink to the native JET DBMS.
--
Arvin Meyer, MCP, MVPhttp://www.datastrat.comhttp://www.mvps.org/accesshttp://www.accessmvp.com
<aaron.ke...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4cb4f3b0-5ad5-4f67-bbaa-a1860bbc2ca6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
yes, if you change a table, then you've got to relink it in 5
different places.
that is why it is considerably easier to move to SQL Server / ADP.
-Aaron
On May 8, 3:55 am, Roger Bell <RogerB...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I have designed a data base which I wish to install on 5 remote computers.
My idea is to link the Backend (Tables). My question is if i change any
reports/mailing labels etc on the server data Base, do I then have to
change
the design on each of the remotes.
Is there any difference between splitting and linking, or is there a way
to
change any report designs that will automatically update on the remotes.
Many thanks for any help- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Networking
- From: Arvin Meyer [MVP]
- Re: Networking
- References:
- Networking
- From: Roger Bell
- Re: Networking
- From: aaron.kempf@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Networking
- From: Arvin Meyer [MVP]
- Networking
- Prev by Date: Re: Networking
- Next by Date: Fonts Color
- Previous by thread: Re: Networking
- Next by thread: Re: Networking
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|