Re: Bloody obvious question
- From: "Douglas J. Steele" <NOSPAM_djsteele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 08:03:41 -0500
"Michael Calwell" <fac@fac> wrote in message
news:436c84ba$0$350$da0feed9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Douglas,
>
> Thank you for your reply. What we will have is one PC acting as both a
> server and a client. It this OK?
Not sure I understand what you mean by that. Unlike, say, SQL Server or
Oracle, Access isn't a server-based DBMS.
Are you saying that you don't have a server, but a peer-to-peer LAN, and the
back-end database will exist on one of the workstations that will also be
used by one of the users? That should work.
If you meant something else, please explain.
--
Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
(no e-mails, please!)
.
- References:
- Bloody obvious question
- From: Michael Calwell
- Re: Bloody obvious question
- From: Douglas J. Steele
- Re: Bloody obvious question
- From: Michael Calwell
- Bloody obvious question
- Prev by Date: Re: FileDialog Widget
- Next by Date: Re: FileDialog Widget
- Previous by thread: Re: Bloody obvious question
- Next by thread: Re: Bloody obvious question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|