Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- From: "CS" <dukster77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:16:47 -0700
Thank you for all your help, Steve -- I will go back and do it the way I
first conceived (glad to know my initial instincts weren't _all_ bad :-) and
stick all this stuff in the tblContacts.
Thanks again for your kind attention on a Saturday --
Carol
"Steve Schapel" <schapel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:utnr%23FgeFHA.2736@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Carol,
>
> Opinions may vary on this. I am not sure why someone else has advised
> you the way they have. One-to-one relationships add complexity to the
> data structure, so there has to be a good reason to introduce this extra
> complexity. In my opinion, your database doesn't even begin to qualify.
> If it was mine, all of the information you listed would absolutely,
> definitely be in the tblContacts table, where you had it in the first
> place. You will be able to get it to work by having it in a separate
> table, but I wouldn't even think about it.
>
> --
> Steve Schapel, Microsoft Access MVP
>
> CS wrote:
> > We would only be interested in how they _initially_ were referred,
> > regardless of what their first contact with the organization was (so
there
> > would, in fact, only be one possible initial referral source), but we
would
> > want to know what their first contact with the organization was.
> >
> > I would say that about 50% of the contacts are NOT referred by someone
else
> > (they find the organization on their own), or, they are existing
contacts
> > from a flat-file DB that is being ported to Access, which did not
collect
> > this information (some of which are 6 - 7 years old) -- when the DB is
ready
> > to go, we will attempt to collect this original referral information for
as
> > many of our existing contacts as possible, but you know how people are
about
> > responding to a survey at times, so we may very well not get this
> > information. What is your opinion on that percentage of total contacts
(400
> > of about around 800 at this point, and growing quickly) in terms of
blanks
> > if all of this is tracked in the basic contact table?
> >
> > Also, we want to gather a number of different pieces of information
about
> > the referral, even if self-referred --
> > 1. Type of first contact with the organization
> > 2. Who referred them, if it is currently a contact in the DB
> > 3. How they found us, if there was no person referring them
> > 4. Date of first contact with organization
> > 5. Notes about the first contact
> >
> > I actually started out with all this in the tblContact, but removed it
and
> > began working with a separate table at the suggestion of someone in this
NG.
> > Since I am not yet truly adept at append, join, etc., I have erred
> > consistently on the side of more rather than less tables.
> >
> > Thanks again for your help,
> > Carol
> >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- From: Steve Schapel
- Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- References:
- Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- From: CS
- Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- From: Steve Schapel
- Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- From: CS
- Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- From: Steve Schapel
- Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- From: CS
- Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- From: Steve Schapel
- Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- Prev by Date: RE: new database
- Next by Date: Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- Previous by thread: Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- Next by thread: Re: Query Me This -- two references to another tables field
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|