Re: Probably an easy question for an expert :)

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance



:) I have no idea what happened to the date, weird...

Charlie

"Rick B" <Anonymous> wrote in message
news:uAWN5h5PFHA.688@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Please fix your system date.
>
>
>
>
> "Charlie Tame" <charlie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23tbO9oyPFHA.2460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Many years ago I used a product called DataEase (Sapphire Systems then)
>> to
>> write a Dos based system and found it intuitive and easy, but I do not
> like
>> their Windows based system because, to me at least, it's too graphical
>> and
>> nowhere near so intuitive or versatile. For example you could easily link
>> Tables (they called them forms because the intuitive part was form-table
>> automation) so that for the example below no external programming was
>> needed.
>>
>> I did a few things with it but for example with stock control...
>>
>> Product table was linked to suppliers table so I could have several
>> suppliers for one product and choose one easily. Similarly items were
> booked
>> out as a transaction (using a more or less ad hoc form) and so one
>> booking
>> could easily pull info from the stock table and do the necessary math.
>> The
>> advantage was that more or less anything could easily be done by
> transaction
>> and thus a history was kept.
>>
>> I have never made a serious attempt with Access, I'm 20+ years older and
>> programming is not my job but I'd like to make the job easier so my basic
>> question is how would one go about doing something similar - for example
>> would it be better to use single machine and just access, or would it be
>> better to use SQL server (even on the same machine) or would SQL server
> and
>> VB be the only viable answer?
>>
>> I think the power of DataEase came from the fact that any report could be
>> used to modify the tables and so giving 50 items to customer A, adjusting
>> stock and generating an order to supplier Z was very simple.
>>
>> I should add I guess that this will be essentially a single location /
> user
>> system but the PC is part of a small business network and running an SQL
>> should present no major problems.
>>
>> So if any experienced access users want to chip in with ideas I'd
> appreciate
>> it, we do not have to be accountable so an expensive bespoke solution is
>> neither desirable nor necessary.
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Charlie
>>
>>
>
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Probably an easy question for an expert :)
    ... > Many years ago I used a product called DataEase to ... > suppliers for one product and choose one easily. ... > could easily pull info from the stock table and do the necessary math. ... > better to use SQL server or would SQL server ...
    (microsoft.public.access.gettingstarted)
  • Probably an easy question for an expert :)
    ... Many years ago I used a product called DataEase to ... I did a few things with it but for example with stock control... ... Product table was linked to suppliers table so I could have several ... better to use SQL server or would SQL server and ...
    (microsoft.public.access.gettingstarted)
  • Re: Probably an easy question for an expert :)
    ... >> suppliers for one product and choose one easily. ... >> could easily pull info from the stock table and do the necessary math. ... >> programming is not my job but I'd like to make the job easier so my basic ... >> better to use SQL server or would SQL server ...
    (microsoft.public.access.gettingstarted)
  • Re: MS Small Biz 2003 --> R2
    ... Is that the word for the day Charlie? ... Premium it's two additional CDs but that's because SQL Server is pretty ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: What version of SQL Server to buy?
    ... Charlie wrote: ... my system has a couple gigs RAM. ... I would like to know what version of SQL Server I should buy. ... Any advice is appreciated. ...
    (comp.databases.ms-sqlserver)