Re: Network

From: Rick Brandt (rickbrandt2_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 05/27/04


Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 08:24:00 -0500


"FJ" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0345EF0A-E266-4FFC-86CD-C40D6319CDEE@microsoft.com...
> I'm new to access but I pick up things fast. We currently have
individual PC's and the only way we transfer or update our database on each
machine is to copy and upload. Needless to say we are looking to go to a
network. I was planning to load the database on to the server and have
every one ACCESS the database that way ( excuse the pun). I was told
however that access does not allow multiple users to access the same info
at the same time or allow records to be added or update while someone else
is using the database. Is this true.
>
> P.S.
> I am not a programer so if there is a way to do this I would appreciate a
layman's response.

That is not true. Access is multi-user capable "right out of the box".
However; it is not *recommended* to have multiple users in the same
application file simultaneously as it can often lead to file corruption
problems.

The "best practice" is to split the application into a data file (tables
only) and a front end file (everything else) that has links to the tables
in the data file. With this setup you put the data file on a network share
and give each user their own separate local copy of the front end file.

Access 97 did a much better job of handling the "everyone using the same
monolithic file" scenario than newer versions so if you have a small number
of users and more reading than writing going on you might get away with
just putting the file on a server and having everyone use it, but I would
not recommend that if the data is mission critical and I would certainly
make sure you are making frequent backups.

-- 
I don't check the Email account attached
to this message.     Send instead to...
RBrandt    at       Hunter      dot      com


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Issues with CHANGE_TRACKING AUTO after initial index population
    ... There's a problem with 64 bit SQL 2005 server. ... Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy ... started the FT initial index population when our site activity is low. ... High activity on the data file. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.fulltext)
  • RE: Merging with Word
    ... You state that your application is not a "spilit" database application. ... you have multiple users and you are attempting to have everyone ... There is no reason for not splitting an application when there are going to ... what I tried is to have Access open a Word Doc and fill in the ...
    (microsoft.public.access.modulesdaovba)
  • Re: Access database stability problems
    ... The backend data files are even located on the same network drive on the server. ... I found out today that people running that database are NOT having crashes like we are. ... What I wanted to strongly recommend is moving your database to an SQL server of some kind, SQL Server 2005 Express if nothing else. ... You haven't said whether 'crashing the database' is just a matter of Access losing its network connection and screaming blue murder, or whether it's actually breaking the backend data file. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: Activate/Enable Multiple users
    ... Access should allow multiple users to select, add, modify, or delete records ... Jerry Whittle, Microsoft Access MVP ... The database does not allow multiple users to add or edit records at ... Microsoft Office Access can't save design changes or save to a new ...
    (microsoft.public.access.queries)
  • Re: Program Files Read Only
    ... using visual studio 2008 that uses an Access database to hold data. ... My eariler version of the application, written with VS 2005 installs ... changing the data file location for over 200 customers. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.security)