Re: Copying Tables



DS <bootybox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:R0CEi.85$Y%7.6@xxxxxxxxxxxx:

Bob Quintal wrote:
DS <bootybox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:OoxEi.243$em3.241@xxxxxxxxxxxx:


I have a question. My database is split. I want a backup copy
of my tables in another database on a different machine. Should
I use transferdatabase to get the info into the backup copy or
should I link the backup copy tables to the original database?
What happens if the original databse gets corrupted? Can I get
the table info into the original databse easily?
Any help appreciated, I'm still a little confused on this issue.
Thanks
DS


The best answer to that is neither transferdatabase nor linking
is a real backup solution. Simply exit the application and copy
the back end to your archive area usaing Windows.

I prefer to also rename the file to add a datestamp in hte
filename, so that you can keep last night's backup, and the night
before, and before. Often corruption will only manifest itself
several daya after occurence.

If your primary backup gets trashed, you simply copy the most
recent uncorrupted backup from the archive over the corrupt .mdb

Thanks Bob,
So that is interesting. "Corruption will only manifest itesl
several days after occurence." I never knew that. So you can be
in truth operating with a corrupt database. I'd like to know more
about corruption.

Example: you have a record get corrupted on tuesday, and it only
gets detected when you run the weekly report on Friday There are
differing levels of corruption, some created by a glitch in the
computer, others are created by a user setting the wrong date into a
record.


The suggestion you gave is a good one, but the probem is that I
want a transaction by tranaction copy of my database so that I can
return to where I was before this happened. So, what options are
there? Thanks
DS

You're dealing with Access here, don't be too picky. If you have a
truly mission-critical application, you should use a dbms with
journalling, and automatic mirroring. These are a lot more expensive
than Access.

I'm not denigrating Access here, I believe that MS-Access is the
best you can buy in its price range, and better than much in higher
ranges. I'm just stating that it is not always the best solution.

--
Bob Quintal

PA is y I've altered my email address.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.



Relevant Pages

  • RE: Information Store Corrupted
    ... depend on the kind of storage you are using. ... If the corruption is a database structure page you will not ... The backup by definition doesn't include the corrupted items. ... Category: Database Page Cache ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: Copying Tables
    ... copy of my tables in another database on a different machine. ... Should I use transferdatabase to get the info into the backup ... "Corruption will only manifest itesl ... want a transaction by tranaction copy of my database so that I ...
    (microsoft.public.access.formscoding)
  • Re: Copying Tables
    ... copy of my tables in another database on a different machine. ... Should I use transferdatabase to get the info into the backup ... "Corruption will only manifest itesl ... want a transaction by tranaction copy of my database so that I ...
    (microsoft.public.access.formscoding)
  • Re: Copying Tables
    ... of my tables in another database on a different machine. ... Should I use transferdatabase to get the info into the backup ... "Corruption will only manifest itesl ... want a transaction by tranaction copy of my database so that I ...
    (microsoft.public.access.formscoding)
  • Re: Corrupt Mailbox Store
    ... Either of these steps will eliminate the corruption. ... If the database does not mount then you will have to resort to restoring the ... You will want to use the backup log as well as the application log to ... determine if this is a hardware problem. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange2000.information.store)

Loading