Re: Option Explicit
- From: "Albert D. Kallal" <PleaseNOOOsPAMmkallal@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 05:27:23 -0600
"David W. Fenton" <XXXusenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
You should still use Option Explicit so you don't write garbage
code.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
Yup...."garbage code" sums it up!!!
For me, it never been a debate...the *first* change in setting is to ensure
option explicit...
It much like putting a seat belt on...it not because it is a local by-law,
it because is common sense.....
--
Albert D. Kallal (Access MVP)
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
pleaseNOOSpamKallal@xxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Option Explicit
- From: Warrio
- Re: Option Explicit
- References:
- Option Explicit
- From: Warrio
- Re: Option Explicit
- From: Marshall Barton
- Re: Option Explicit
- From: Warrio
- Re: Option Explicit
- From: Rick Brandt
- Re: Option Explicit
- From: Warrio
- Re: Option Explicit
- From: Douglas J. Steele
- Re: Option Explicit
- From: Warrio
- Re: Option Explicit
- From: Albert D. Kallal
- Re: Option Explicit
- From: David W. Fenton
- Option Explicit
- Prev by Date: Re: Option Explicit
- Next by Date: Re: Creating A Wizard Type Form
- Previous by thread: Re: Option Explicit
- Next by thread: Re: Option Explicit
- Index(es):
Loading