Re: Calling functions from queries
From: MacDermott (macdermott_at_NoSpam.com)
Date: 08/24/04
- Next message: MacDermott: "Re: Blank subforms"
- Previous message: Bill Davis: "Sub form Help"
- In reply to: ABL: "Calling functions from queries"
- Next in thread: Dale Fye: "Re: Calling functions from queries"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:26:40 -0400
My best advice would be to try it out and see.
Some functions run pretty quickly, others take longer.
Today's processor speeds are such that what used to be significant
performance hits are often barely noticable.
If you're calling these functions from a query, I don't know how you'd
spread the big string back out over the 8 columns without another major
bunch of function calls...
There's often a lot that can be done with query optimization, but a lot of
that is already done internally by Access (Jet), and it's usually pretty
specific to the functions in question...
- Turtle
"ABL" <ablnews@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:cgfv4i02iua@news1.newsguy.com...
> I have a query that has calculated fields and joins in it. I am
> wondering what kind of performance hit I might expect if I have to call
> functions 8 times(!) per row returned.
>
> 6 of these calls are to two functions (3 each) with different values.
> All 8 columns are consecutive. Would it be quicker to call one big
> function and return the "8 columns" in one big string (I am not using
> header rows, and these calculations are read only, so I don't need to
> change them)?
>
> Any suggestions for increasing performance are welcome.
>
> I am using A2K.
>
> Thanks,
> Alden
>
> Plese reply only to the newsgroup. This email address is seldom checked
> and is used to catch unsolicited email.
- Next message: MacDermott: "Re: Blank subforms"
- Previous message: Bill Davis: "Sub form Help"
- In reply to: ABL: "Calling functions from queries"
- Next in thread: Dale Fye: "Re: Calling functions from queries"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|