Re: Q. Is 19 fields too much for a query ?
From: Steve Schapel (schapel_at_mvps.org.ns)
Date: 03/12/04
- Next message: Kurt: "Re: Getting the Record X of Y value for subform"
- Previous message: Marco Castro: "Re: Creating a report entirely through code"
- In reply to: fredg: "Re: Q. Is 19 fields too much for a query ?"
- Next in thread: John Vinson: "Re: Q. Is 19 fields too much for a query ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:11:16 +1300
Jim,
To add to Fred's comments, be aware that, depending on various factors
of the structure of the data and the relationships between the tables
(not the number of fields), your query may or may not be "updateable".
So, if the purpose is to display the query's data on a form, this will
be fine, as Fred said. If your intention is to enter/edit data on the
form, this may not be possible.
-- Steve Schapel, Microsoft Access MVP fredg wrote: > There shouldn't be any problem making the query or displaying the > returned data in a form. Make sure that all the relationships are > correct between the tables.
- Next message: Kurt: "Re: Getting the Record X of Y value for subform"
- Previous message: Marco Castro: "Re: Creating a report entirely through code"
- In reply to: fredg: "Re: Q. Is 19 fields too much for a query ?"
- Next in thread: John Vinson: "Re: Q. Is 19 fields too much for a query ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|