Re: CDONTS and SMTP server
From: Tony Toews (ttoews_at_telusplanet.net)
Date: 02/10/04
- Next message: Joe Bloggs: "Re: Adding Years"
- Previous message: Douglas J. Steele: "Re: Unusual Export Requirement"
- In reply to: TC: "Re: CDONTS and SMTP server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:21:38 -0700
aatcbbtccctc@yahoo.com (TC) wrote:
>> Within a, hopefully, short period of time, there will be verification
>> that the mail server who allegedly sent the email actually is the
>> sender. Sounds like using keys in the DNS system is the process that
>> will be happening.
>>
>> When this comes in place all mail not sent via your ISP or email
>> server which will add an authentication key to the email will be
>> suspected to be a spam and treated accordingly.
>>
>> And I will be on that bandwagon as soon as it's available. <smile>
>>
>> Thus blat may no longer be of much use after this is all in place.
>>
>> Tony
>
>
>Hmm! Just saw your reply. Hope you see this one.
>
>Are you saying that in your opinion, the new verification methods will
>come in at the client end? That is, the *client* software (Outlook,
>Eudora, BLAT, or whatever) will need to be modified?
>
>My assumption was, that the new methods would come in at the
>*originating mailserver* end. That is, the client software sends an
>SMTP request to the appropriate ISP mailserver, in the existing
>manner. The mailserver decides whether or not to accept that request,
>in the existing manner (eg. using IP address checking). Then the
>mailserver does some new tricks to authenticate itself to other serves
>down the track.
To me though IP address checking will not be sufficient now or in the
future. You should be required to give the SMTP server a password.
Otherwise the viruses will then locate your ISP settings and start
sending viruses via the ISP SMTP server. Hopefully your email
software will have your password securely encrypted.
That said I feel that ISP email software should start having virus
deletion in place on incoming email along with limits on qty of emails
which can be sent. Ie 100 per hour ought to be sufficient for anyone
but an MVP. <smile> And if you start sending viruses in your email
your ability to send emails is frozen until you contact your ISP.
>If your view on this is correct, then, things like BLAT will need to
>be modified. But if mine is correct, they will continue to work
>unchanged.
But then blat will likely be changed. It shouldn't take too much to
add the userid and encrypted password parameters.
>This issue is important to me, because I'm in the process of adding
>"mailmerge to email" functions to my main product. I don't want to use
>MAPI or CDONTS, so I've decided to go the "email directly from VBA"
>track.
I'd go directly from VBA in Access anyhow. Presumably going directly
to the WinSock via API calls? This way you have complete control and
store all the settings within your product.
FWIW I have some TCP/IP VB URLs at my website.
Tony
-- Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can read the entire thread of messages. Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
- Next message: Joe Bloggs: "Re: Adding Years"
- Previous message: Douglas J. Steele: "Re: Unusual Export Requirement"
- In reply to: TC: "Re: CDONTS and SMTP server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|