Re: One for the MVPs?
- From: "tina" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 08:20:47 GMT
i heartily agree with Gunny. the deductive abilities of many of the MVPs and
other expert developers in these newsgroups is nothing short of amazing. and
that so many of them give so freely of their time and expertise in the same
field where they make their living, is incredibly generous. sometimes the
real head-breaker problems are due to underlying design issues that simply
can't be unraveled without hands-on examination. there are a number of
highly skilled developers here that i would recommend my company hire, in a
heartbeat, to troubleshoot a database problem that i was unable to solve
with the assistance of these volunteers.
"'69 Camaro" <ForwardZERO_SPAM.To.69Camaro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:0ECE2145-C0A9-4B61-AAD8-C1053F3D277B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi, Rob.
>
> > Where can I get a definitive answer, if no-one in the newsgroup(s) can
help?
>
> <Cough!> No one?!! Many of the people who answer questions in the
> newsgroups can troubleshoot others' database problems most of the time
with
> just a few clues and after asking a few of the right questions -- without
> ever laying eyes on the database itself. If you think about it, that
takes
> incredible talent. Many of these folks work with Access for a living, and
> what assistance they offer to people in need in these newsgroups without
> charge is only a fraction of the spectacular services they offer to their
> paying clients.
>
> If I needed a definitive answer but didn't already know how to
troubleshoot
> tricky problems in Access, I'd put my go-fasters on my feet and zoom over
to
> the reports newsgroup, do some research to find the consultants who can
> obviously "walk the walk" and hire one of them for a fraction of what
> Microsoft charges for tech support. These experts can give a lot more
> valuable advice about your database by actually looking at it than they
can
> from reading short descriptions of what the problem is.
>
> And remember that the data source for a report and a form can be the same,
> but the resulting data set for the report can be a little different to
> accommodate the formatting. Check to ensure that no formatted record
exceeds
> 2,000 characters in the report (excluding Memo and OLE fields), because
this
> too will result in the "too many fields defined" error message in the
report,
> even with far fewer than 255 fields.
>
> HTH.
>
> Gunny
>
> See http://www.QBuilt.com for all your database needs.
> See http://www.Access.QBuilt.com for Microsoft Access tips.
>
> (Please remove ZERO_SPAM from my reply E-mail address, so that a message
> will be forwarded to me.)
> Beware to those who use munged addresses: known newsgroup E-mail
harvesters
> for spammers are Ripley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> "Rob Parker" wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the interest. Seems (from responses so far, in both this and
the
> > reports newsgroup) that no-one knows what the problem is, or if there's
an
> > alternative to my kludge subreport for totals workaround.
> >
> > C'est la vie :-)
> >
> > BTW, have you seen my other question, re copy/paste of a record? I've
not
> > got a useable answer to that one yet either ;-)
> >
> > Where can I get a definitive answer, if no-one in the newsgroup(s) can
help?
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > "Sandra Daigle" <Invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:%23tvZiV8VFHA.2796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Well it was worth a shot - I'm not really sure what else might be
going
> > on.
> > <snip>
> >
> >
> >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: One for the MVPs?
- From: Rob Parker
- Re: One for the MVPs?
- From: Mike Painter
- Re: One for the MVPs?
- References:
- One for the MVPs?
- From: Rob Parker
- Re: One for the MVPs?
- From: Sandra Daigle
- Re: One for the MVPs?
- From: Rob Parker
- Re: One for the MVPs?
- From: Sandra Daigle
- Re: One for the MVPs?
- From: Rob Parker
- Re: One for the MVPs?
- From: '69 Camaro
- One for the MVPs?
- Prev by Date: Re: One for the MVPs?
- Next by Date: Re: Combo Box
- Previous by thread: Re: One for the MVPs?
- Next by thread: Re: One for the MVPs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|