Re: changing a recordset through a form
From: Jeff Boyce (JeffBoyce_IF_at_msn.com-DISCARD_HYPHEN_TO_END)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: Sprinks: "Re: Averaging separate fields in a form, excluding blanks"
- Previous message: Rolf Rosenquist: "Re: New record in a datasheet?"
- In reply to: dshemesh: "Re: changing a recordset through a form"
- Next in thread: dshemesh: "Re: changing a recordset through a form"
- Reply: dshemesh: "Re: changing a recordset through a form"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 05:02:25 -0800
If this were happening to me, I would look at the fields that are included
in the query -- I'd check to make sure that the RoomID field that the users
can change is the one that comes from the main table.
I don't understand, however, how the tblBuilding would have its data
changed. From your description, it sounds like you have:
?YourTable
...
RoomID
related one-to-many to:
tblRoom
RoomID
RoomName
BuildingID
related one-to-many to:
tblBuilding
BuildingID
...
If this is accurate, changing RoomID in YourTable won't affect a row in
tblBuilding. But as I mentioned at the top, maybe it isn't YourTable's
RoomID that your query/form is changing...
-- Good luck Jeff Boyce <Access MVP> "dshemesh" <dshemesh@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:D630712E-10B6-48A9-8C1D-025751DA4895@microsoft.com... > It is based on a query which joins the necessary fields from each table. > > "Jeff Boyce" wrote: > > > Is your form based directly on the table, or on a query which joins the > > underlying tables you describe? > > > > -- > > More info, please ... > > > > Jeff Boyce > > <Access MVP> > > > > "dshemesh" <dshemesh@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:214F391E-27B0-4C9B-A3E2-D5FEDAC646B0@microsoft.com... > > > Hello, > > > I encoutered the following problem when trying to let the user change a > > > recordset (or/and add new records to the recrdset) using a form: > > > I want the form to show all the records of a certain table on the same > > time > > > (i.e. I do not want the user to be able to see only one record at a time), > > > and to give the user the ability to change the existing records and add a > > new > > > record if wanted. Up to here everything is working fine, but the problem > > is > > > this: > > > each record in the table I want to change has a certain property taken > > from > > > anoter table. > > > For example: In the original table (the one I want the user to change) > > there > > > is a field called 'roomId'. > > > There is another table which is called roomsT in which there are the > > > following fields: roomId, roomName, buildingId. meaning, every room is a > > part > > > of a building, and this information is written in the roomT table. > > > There is a third table called buildingsT containing the following fields: > > > buildingId, buildingName. > > > I want to show in the form each and every record from the original table, > > > plus the appropriate building for this record. moreover, I want to give > > the > > > user the possibility to change any field in the original table, including > > the > > > field 'roomId'. If the user changes the 'roomId' of a record, I want the > > > buildingName on the form to change automatically to the appropriate > > building > > > (but only the buildingName of the record which was changed. all other > > > buldingNames on the form, of other records, should remain unchanged). What > > I > > > don't want (and can't find a way to avoid) is that when the user changes > > the > > > 'roomId' of an existing record, the buildingName will not change in the > > > biuldingsT table. > > > For example: If the original table has a record in which the roomId was > > > '25', and the building to which this room belongs has a buildingId '44', > > and > > > a building name 'a'. when the user changes the roomId in the original > > table > > > to be, let's say, 20, and the building to which this room belongs to has a > > > buildingId '40' and buildingName 'b', I do not want the buildingName of > > > buidingId '40' to be changed to 'a' (which happens right now). > > > Moreover, if the user adds a new record to the original table, a new > > record > > > is currently added to the buildingsT table (given a new automatic Id, and > > the > > > correct buildingName). And of course this is unwanted, since the > > buildingsT > > > table should remain unchanged after adding a new record to the original > > table. > > > Can anyone please help? > > > thank you... > > > -- > > > dshemesh > > > >
- Next message: Sprinks: "Re: Averaging separate fields in a form, excluding blanks"
- Previous message: Rolf Rosenquist: "Re: New record in a datasheet?"
- In reply to: dshemesh: "Re: changing a recordset through a form"
- Next in thread: dshemesh: "Re: changing a recordset through a form"
- Reply: dshemesh: "Re: changing a recordset through a form"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|