Re: Data Entry Problem - Form/Subforms
From: Jamie Richards (junkmail_at_westnet.com.au)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: papa: "field with conditional viewing"
- Previous message: fredg: "Re: Checkbox values"
- In reply to: D'Lilah: "Re: Data Entry Problem - Form/Subforms"
- Next in thread: D'Lilah: "Re: Data Entry Problem - Form/Subforms"
- Reply: D'Lilah: "Re: Data Entry Problem - Form/Subforms"
- Reply: D'Lilah: "Re: Data Entry Problem - Form/Subforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:21:41 +0800
No probs, sample db available if required.
Jamie :o)
"D'Lilah" <DLilah@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C024DAA8-2B25-4C50-94B7-5214591FE357@microsoft.com...
> Jamie:
>
> I can't thank you enough for the help. I probably won't be able to try
> your
> suggestions for a little while, but I will definitely let you know how I
> make
> out. Once again, thanks soooo much for the guidance.
>
> "Jamie Richards" wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> Sorry, but this will be a little lengthy, but my wife is sleeping so I
>> have
>> the time ;o)
>>
>> Looking at the structure of your two tables I would be inclined to put
>> everything into one, with an extra field that links parents and children
>> together. This table would look something like:
>>
>> Name:
>> tblClients
>>
>> Fields:
>> ClientID, ClientGroupID, LName, FName, MName, Deceased
>>
>> Data would look like this:
>>
>> ClientID: 101 (this is just a random number I picked, use
>> whatever you're using)
>> ClientGroupID: 10 (same again here...)
>> LName: Bloggs
>> FName: Jane
>> MName: Sarah
>> Deceased: False
>>
>> If Jane had a daughter, you would enter all of the details particular to
>> the
>> daughter, only the ClientGroupID would be the same as Jane's (as they
>> belong
>> to the same family). In this way, you can add family members ad
>> infinitum
>> if you want, without needing another table.
>>
>> When you set up the table, set the primary key o compise of both ClientID
>> and ClientGroupID. However, if this will create problems for you when
>> trying to link the Clients table to other tables in your database, use a
>> constraint on the ClientGroupID instead, which enforces uniqueness of
>> ClientID and ClientGroupID for every row. How? Use the indexes section
>> in
>> table design view (the little lightening bolt icon). When viewing the
>> indexes ensure the ClientGrooupID field is visible. In the "Index Name"
>> column call it "idxClientGroupID". Set the properties of the index in
>> the
>> lower part of the window to; Primary: No, Unique: Yes, Ignore Nulls: No.
>> Your table will now force you to have a unique ClientID and ClientGroupID
>> for every row.
>>
>> Modify/re-create your form to run off the single table. This should get
>> rid
>> of your problems and still afford you a relatively efficient means of
>> managing you data.
>>
>> If I haven't been clear, please re-post and I'll clarify.
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>> "D'Lilah" <DLilah@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:76F577A2-AB0F-448E-A338-81F4C2F11F3A@microsoft.com...
>> > Jamie:
>> >
>> > Thank you so much for the detailed response and explanation.
>> > Everything
>> > you
>> > have said makes sense and it's about what I suspected, but I have no
>> > idea
>> > how
>> > to fix it.
>> >
>> > First of all, I do want the DataEntry property set to yes. I have a
>> > different form to deal with viewing and changing existing records and
>> > this
>> > form is strictly for adding new records.
>> >
>> > I believe the two tables I am dealing with need to be in separate
>> > tables.
>> > One, tblClientID, is strictly to assign a client ID to each client.
>> > The
>> > reason why I have TblNames separately is because each client ID
>> > pertains
>> > to
>> > more than one individual. I am dealing with clients that are mainly
>> > married
>> > couples and sometimes their children. I have one client ID per family
>> > and
>> > then a separate "Client #" to identify each family member (which I need
>> > in
>> > order to connect documents created for each family member to them).
>> > Here
>> > are
>> > the fields in my two tables:
>> >
>> > TblClientID: ClientID, Comments
>> > TblNames: ClientID, Client#, LName, FName, MName, Deceased
>> >
>> > Do you believe there is a better way of handling this? I am open to
>> > any
>> > suggestions.
>> >
>> > If I have the table structure done properly, how would I go about
>> > forcing
>> > a
>> > refresh or executing a save command. I have tried executing a save
>> > command,
>> > but could not figure out how to do it correctly.
>> >
>> > I guess I could always put something in the Comments field and solve
>> > the
>> > problem, but I would prefer not to.
>> >
>> > Any help would be greatly appreciated, since I have been struggling
>> > with
>> > this for quite some time.
>> >
>> > "Jamie Richards" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> It sounds as if you have a relationship constraint between tblClientID
>> >> and
>> >> the other tables which requires a record to exist in the one side of
>> >> the
>> >> relationship (in this case tblClientID) before a related record can be
>> >> created in a table on the many side (e.g. tblNames).
>> >>
>> >> The reason that you are unable to skip the [not required] field called
>> >> Comments and go straight to your subform is because no record has been
>> >> created on the "one side" (tblClientID). The default value that
>> >> appears
>> >> is
>> >> merely that, a default, it's presence does not signify that a new
>> >> record
>> >> has
>> >> been inserted. As soon as you enter comments, the data is written to
>> >> tblClientID and viola, you have satisfied the relationship constraint
>> >> and
>> >> are able to enter data into your related subforms. Am I making sense?
>> >>
>> >> I doubt that the DataEntry property of the main form has anything to
>> >> do
>> >> with
>> >> this problem, however you should be aware that setting this value to
>> >> yes
>> >> will prevent your users from viewing existing records. The DataEntry
>> >> property, when set to yes, tells Access to ignore existing records and
>> >> have
>> >> the form open to receive data only.
>> >>
>> >> I am not sure why you have what *seems* to be related data split into
>> >> separate tables, but if there are no other data items you need in your
>> >> tblClientID table, you could force a refresh of the main form before
>> >> entering data into the subform, or execute a save command so that a
>> >> record
>> >> is created for you. I personally would not do this and would (with
>> >> respect)
>> >> have a look at your tables and see if each one represents a single
>> >> subject
>> >> and it's characteristics. It might save you a bit of grief later.
>> >>
>> >> Hope all this babble somehow helps.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jamie
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "D'Lilah" <DLilah@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:D3CFD754-0AB5-4E39-9601-80F7446240FF@microsoft.com...
>> >> >I have a main Form with Subforms which are linked by "ClientID". The
>> >> >record
>> >> > source for the Form is "TblClientID" and the Subforms are "TblNames"
>> >> > and
>> >> > "TblAddresses". "ClientID" has a default value that is calculated
>> >> > by
>> >> > adding
>> >> > 1 to the highest ClientID number in TblClientID
>> >> > (=DMax("[ClientID]","TblClientID")+1).
>> >> >
>> >> > When I open the main Form (Data Entry property is set to "Yes"), the
>> >> > default
>> >> > value in the ClientID is correct, but when I try to add a record to
>> >> > a
>> >> > Subform, I get the following error "You cannot add or change a
>> >> > record
>> >> > because
>> >> > a related record is required in "TblClientID".
>> >> >
>> >> > There is a "Comment" Control on the main Form as well, which is not
>> >> > required. However, if I enter data into the "Comment" Control, I do
>> >> > not
>> >> > get
>> >> > this error and am able to add records into all of the Subforms.
>> >> > Additionally, using the same form with the Data Entry property set
>> >> > to
>> >> > "No", I
>> >> > can add new records to the Subforms.
>> >> >
>> >> > Can anyone help me figure this out? I am new to code but I can
>> >> > struggle
>> >> > through with some guidance. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>> >> > If
>> >> > more
>> >> > information is needed, please let me know. Thank you in advance.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
- Next message: papa: "field with conditional viewing"
- Previous message: fredg: "Re: Checkbox values"
- In reply to: D'Lilah: "Re: Data Entry Problem - Form/Subforms"
- Next in thread: D'Lilah: "Re: Data Entry Problem - Form/Subforms"
- Reply: D'Lilah: "Re: Data Entry Problem - Form/Subforms"
- Reply: D'Lilah: "Re: Data Entry Problem - Form/Subforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|