Re: Distributing Runtime Only
- From: "Scott McDaniel" <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 06:55:51 -0400
"Ian Holder" <Ian Holder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:A921DDD8-1427-43C5-96D6-87B85BD77891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> All,
>
> I have a database on a shared drive that three users shall be working
> with.
> Can I simply bundle up the files needed for runtime in an Installation
> Package and get the users to install it? Or do I need to have a database
> in
> an Installation Package?
Generally speaking, you would split your database into a frontend (forms,
reports, queries, macros, and modules) and backend (tables) and distribute
only the frontend (this would be the "database" you would distribute)... the
backend would stay on the server, and each user would connect their own
frontend to a common backend. So the only files needed to distribute would
be the frontend ... this is quite basic, as your frontend may have
dependancies that may not be present on the enduser machines ... if you used
any ActiveX controls you must make sure they are available, all references
must match up, etc etc ... deploying an app can be a big project.
Do your endusers have the correct version of Access installed? If so, you
only need to distribute the frontend ... if they do not have the correct
version, then you must distribute the Runtime (included in the Developers
edition) to each, and install it. Be warned, however, that doing this can
cause some unwanted effects ... if users don't need the runtime, don't
install it.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian.
>
>
.
- References:
- Distributing Runtime Only
- From: Ian Holder
- Distributing Runtime Only
- Prev by Date: Re: Distributing Runtime Only
- Next by Date: Re: Distributing Runtime Only
- Previous by thread: Re: Distributing Runtime Only
- Next by thread: RE: Distributing Runtime Only
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|