Re: 5 access 2000 users and 1 AccessXP user
- From: "Allen Browne" <AllenBrowne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:31:35 +0800
"All kinds of errors" is not specific enough to debug.
Office security messages? Linked-table errors? Library errors? Network
issues?
--
Allen Browne - Microsoft MVP. Perth, Western Australia.
Tips for Access users - http://allenbrowne.com/tips.html
Reply to group, rather than allenbrowne at mvps dot org.
"Brendhan" <Brendhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2981DA56-95FA-4636-9C44-D8A594EFA2F7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Allen:
>
> Making the user an administrator on the local machine worked for the case
> where I upgraded a win2K box to winXP and kept Office 2000 untouched (the
> Access database in question is in Access 2000). Thank you very much.
>
> However, for the case where I brought in a new, out of the box, PC with
> Win
> XP and Office 2003 pre-loaded, I cannot get the front end to open once I
> copy
> it to th PC (it is an mde file). I get all kinds of errors (not read-only
> errors like the win2K box). The back end is on a server running win2K
> server.
>
> Can you help regarding this remaining problem by giving me any other
> suggestions? I am very happy to have the problem solved on the win2K box
> so
> we can at least use our application.
> --
> BZ - Essex, Massachusetts, USA
>
>
> "Allen Browne" wrote:
>
>> Suggestions:
>>
>> 1. Using Windows Explorer, locate the front end mdb file on the
>> workstation.
>> Right-click and choose Properties. Make sure the Read-Only check box is
>> unchecked. If you see an Unblock button, click that. (Typically where the
>> file was received by email.)
>>
>> 2. Go to Tools | Options on each of the Access workstations, and set:
>> Advanced | Default Open Mode to "Shared".
>> General | Name AutoCorrect boxes to unchecked.
>>
>> 3. Make sure Sandbox mode is disabled:
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/239482/en-us
>>
>> 4. Check the permissions of the folder where the workstations are
>> connected
>> to. They need read, write, and delete permissions. (I have one client
>> whose
>> "server" has multiple hierarchial shares on the drive, and if they choose
>> the wrong one (a top-level read-only) instead of the lower-level
>> write-enabled share, they get this problem.)
>>
>> 5. Make sure the users are logged in as local-computer administrators
>> (not
>> limited users.)
>>
>> 6. Make sure all users have Service Pack 8 for JET 4. Locate the file
>> msjet40.dll. Right-click and choose Properties. On the Version tab, you
>> should see 40.8xxx.0. The xxx digits don't matter, but if you don't see
>> the
>> 8, download from:
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/239114
>>
>> 7. If the problem still persists, the "read-only" message can occur
>> because
>> *one* of the workstations has opened the data exclusively.
>>
>>
>> "Brendhan" <Brendhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:DB274A77-FAD4-4524-B45B-FE2528A5FEAE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Anna:
>> >
>> > I have a question that perhaps you or someone else in the group can
>> > answer.
>> > I, too, have a split database with the backend on a server. I recently
>> > started upgrading my win2K clients to XP and the server is still
>> > running
>> > win2K Server. I tried to open the database using Access 2000 on one of
>> > the
>> > clients that I upgraded to XP and I get a message indicating that the
>> > database is read only (which isn't true) and, although I can see the
>> > data,
>> > the program won't let me change anything.
>> >
>> > Also, I have some brand-new XP clients that came with Access 2003
>> > pre-loaded. These can't even open the database - even as read only.
>> > The
>> > problem obviously has something to do with a Windows 2000 server and a
>> > win
>> > XP
>> > client with respect to Access 2000.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 5 access 2000 users and 1 AccessXP user
- From: Brendhan
- Re: 5 access 2000 users and 1 AccessXP user
- References:
- RE: 5 access 2000 users and 1 AccessXP user
- From: Brendhan
- Re: 5 access 2000 users and 1 AccessXP user
- From: Allen Browne
- Re: 5 access 2000 users and 1 AccessXP user
- From: Brendhan
- RE: 5 access 2000 users and 1 AccessXP user
- Prev by Date: Re: DAO and conversion
- Next by Date: Re: 5 access 2000 users and 1 AccessXP user
- Previous by thread: Re: 5 access 2000 users and 1 AccessXP user
- Next by thread: Re: 5 access 2000 users and 1 AccessXP user
- Index(es):