Re: Upsizing to SQL Server
- From: "qinglianzhou" <jiangyufengqingx@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:09:49 +0800
00
"Robert1105" <Robert1105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ
:9DD1C57D-058C-4EB4-B318-D9A2535963BF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> We are migrating from Jet to MSDE with Access 2000. Are the user
limitation
> the same in both? Should we be able to support the same number of
concurrent
> sessions with MSDE as we did with Jet. It seems that this should be the
> case. I was just wonder what the real world experience is with this?
>
> When you say MSDE is a "clipped" version of SQL, what is done to clip the
> MSDE?
>
> Regards,
>
> "Pat Hartman" wrote:
>
> > If you are using SQL server you shouldn't run into limitations as long
as
> > you have SQL server licenses for everyone. The limitation was probably
> > referring to MSDE. That is a crippled version of SQL server that ships
with
> > A2K and newer.
> >
> > "Weste" <Weste@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:3782DDBE-11DE-4523-B06E-C6719916CFE8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > We are upsizing our current Access 97 application to SQL Server. We
are
> > > doing this in a phased approach. First we are going to upsize the
tables.
> > > We are then going to link to the SQL tables from the current Access
FE. I
> > > read that we will have limitations in terms of the number of users
the
> > > application will be able to support using this configuration from the
book
> > > Microsoft Access Developer's Guide to SQL Server by Mary Chipman and
Andy
> > > Brown. I understand that this configuration will consume more
resources
> > on
> > > the network and server. Is this causing the limit on the number of
users?
> > > About how many concurrent users should we be able to support using
this
> > > configuration? Thanks for your help.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
.
- Prev by Date: Re: save as Access 97 mdb..
- Next by Date: where to get Access 97..
- Previous by thread: Re: problem with importing
- Next by thread: where to get Access 97..
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
