Re: 97 to 2000
From: Roger Carlson (NO-carlsoro-SPAM_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/03/04
- Next message: Roger Carlson: "Re: Converting from 97 to 2002 and file size"
- Previous message: stephanie.white_at_quintiles.com: "Migration to XP"
- In reply to: Salli: "97 to 2000"
- Next in thread: Salli: "Re: 97 to 2000"
- Reply: Salli: "Re: 97 to 2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:21:14 -0500
It's impossible to say. It depends on the specifics of your application.
However, I have upgraded hundreds of Access 97 applications (most of them
being code intensive) without any problem. That's not to say it can't
happen. The good news is that you don't actually convert a database. The
conversion utility creates a NEW Access 2000 database then imports and
upgrades all of the objects, setting the proper references along the way.
If there IS a problem, you still have your original database to go back to.
Just don't delete it until you are SURE the new one is working properly.
-- --Roger Carlson www.rogersaccesslibrary.com Reply to: Roger dot Carlson at Spectrum-Health dot Org "Salli" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:626c01c40127$a3837430$a501280a@phx.gbl... > Hi there, > > I am currently building a database in Access 97. In four > months, we will be converting to Access 2000. Are there > any issues that I need to be aware of - will I lose any > functionality when making the upgrade to 2000? > > Thank you so much, > > Salli
- Next message: Roger Carlson: "Re: Converting from 97 to 2002 and file size"
- Previous message: stephanie.white_at_quintiles.com: "Migration to XP"
- In reply to: Salli: "97 to 2000"
- Next in thread: Salli: "Re: 97 to 2000"
- Reply: Salli: "Re: 97 to 2000"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|