Re: Alternatives to ADP?
- From: mcnews <mcourter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:44:51 -0700
On Oct 20, 6:25 pm, el zorro <elzo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I am currently experimenting with upsizing a front end/back end Access 2000
database (via the upsizing Wizard) and have found that keeping the front end
an mdb with the back end converted to SQL Server 2000 results in
excruciatingly SLOW execution speeds for the queries. As I understand it,
this is because the queries (about 50 of them) are being executed on each
workstation, not the server. Some of these queries are pretty complex, but
they are essential for most, if not all, of the reports and forms to function
correctly.
So I am now testing the other upsizing option that creates an adp file. Only
about half of the queries made the migration successfully, but preliminary
testing of the partsthat do work indicates that the adp approach will result
in much faster
response times for the user.
HOWEVER, I am concerned about the posts that suggest Microsoft is
dropping support for adp. One of the reasons I have been asked by the Powers
That Be to upgrade the database is to allow for future growth. I'm not sure I
can claim that adp is the future.
Are there any long term alternatives to adp that will allow me to migrate to
a more robust platform (with the queries on the server) without having to
completly reprogram my current Access database?
watch out for nested queries (queries that call other queries).
these will definitely cause round trips and bog things down if the
nest goes too deep.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alternatives to ADP?
- From: David W. Fenton
- Re: Alternatives to ADP?
- Prev by Date: Re: New 2007 User
- Next by Date: Re: New 2007 User
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternatives to ADP?
- Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to ADP?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading