Re: Access 2003 to SQL Server 2000 over a VPN



Robert, Sylvain,

Not sure that I can fully respond to this question as I'm not aware of what
aspects of Access 2007 ADP's were regarded as performing slowly.

However, I installed the patch a few weeks ago and whilst startup
performance appears to have improved. Shutdown performance is still slow, but
once the application is up and running (as an ADP or ADE) it seems to perform
as well as in previous Access versions, although I am still in the process of
system testing following upgrading from A2003.

The main performance problems I have are related to the development
environment... in particular form design, just moving between tabs on a tab
control to access subforms can take up to 30 seconds, and accessing the VBA
window is also a lot slower than it use to be.

Generally I find the response of most commands even simple things like
Control Alignment to be much slower than previous versions of Access.
Although, not sure whether this is because the ribbon doesn't appear to react
as quickly as the previous menu system, or the fact that I'm running on
Windows Vista with only a 3.2 GHz P4 and 2Gb of memory.

Having said all this I don't believe the performance problems I've
discovered so far are significant enough to prevent anyone from using or
upgrading an existing Access application to A2007.

Just my 2 cents worth.

Guy





"Robert Morley" wrote:

On a related note, I have no experience with A2007 myself, but I seem to
remember hearing that the patch didn't entirely address the sluggishness of
A2007 when opening ADP's...that it was "better", but not "fixed". Can you
confirm whether or not that's still an issue, just so I know what to tell
people? Thanks!


Rob

"Sylvain Lafontaine" <sylvain aei ca (fill the blanks, no spam please)>
wrote in message news:O6e3K9AuHHA.1208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is the aforementionned patch:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936519/en-us

However, I don't know personnally if it works properly.

--
Sylvain Lafontaine, ing.
MVP - Technologies Virtual-PC
E-mail: sylvain aei ca (fill the blanks, no spam please)


"Robert Morley" <rmorley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eCmIKSAuHHA.1052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Aaron, bye Aaron.

(For those who may not have come across Aaron before, he is a very
abusive troll in the Access newsgroups whose entire purpose in life is to
get everybody to use ADP/SQL Server for absolutely everything from
one-person databases to international databases to dating to washing the
dishes. He has recently discovered the joys of changing his address in
order to get around the blocks Microsoft has placed on him, and
frequently impersonates Access MVPs in the hopes of adding credibility to
his abusive ravings.)


Rob

"Tom Wimpernads" <tw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O6r9%23W9tHHA.736@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Robert;

where did you come up with this crap, bitch?

MS just came out with a patch for ADP a few months ago



"Robert Morley" <rmorley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OUvd0P3tHHA.3468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
With a moderately well-designed database, VPN should be quite feasible.
The simpler the database, the easier it will be to set up in this kind
of
environment. I would recommend looking at the possibility of using an
ADP, rather than an MDB, but there's the distinct disadvantage that ADP
may not be well-supported in the future. Microsoft has not clearly
commented on their direction with ADP's. (There's also a bug in Access
2007 that causes tremendous slowness for ADP's, though it doesn't occur
in earlier versions.)

To give you an idea, I'm using a fairly complex database using and ADP
as
the front end over a VPN connection. Since I work from home, I use it
every single day. The VPN speed is nominally 3M/800k, though we have
bad
lines in our area, so typically get about 2M/500k. The design of the
database was not well-written for a client-server model, since that's
not
how it started its life, though it's been tweaked to be at least
somewhat
better. Nevertheless, I find the speed quite acceptable for most of the
work that I do.

A *very* simple, *very* well-designed client/server database could
conceivably even be used over a slow connection like a modem, but as a
rule, I wouldn't want to try it.



Rob

"James Franklin" <jimbo.jetset@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5qSfi.6657$_l6.2897@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

I have a client who has a simple Access database, which he now
requires
to be accessible to up to 50 concurrent users remotely over the
internet, as well as a small number of local LAN users.

I am looking at a solution whereby the data is stored in a SQL server
database, with front-end Access mdb's on each machine, connecting via
ODBC, either directly over the LAN or over a VPN for the remote users.
The client will either have an ADSL or SDSL broadband connection to
the
server through a managed firewall.

Can anyone tell me if this is feasible, and if so, what connection
speeds would be required to support this number of users? Although the
worst case scenario is 50 concurrent users, the likelihood is that
there
would never be more than about 15 connected at the same time.

Any help is greatly appreciated!
Jim












.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Confusion about database updates
    ... all connecting to the same database server. ... >> The problem occurs when connection to the database server is lost. ... Let the MySQL server do that when your client ...
    (comp.lang.java.databases)
  • Re: Recordsource only available to Administrator on clients
    ... if in the ADP all database items appear ... are you able to double-click and execute the uspPT stored procedure from ... Server instance is readily connected via SSMSE (Server type: Database ... to temporarily set a client user's privileges from, ...
    (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)
  • Re: Access 2003 to SQL Server 2000 over a VPN
    ... you're careful about your database design, though, that may be the way to ... As a result of the difficulties I've had, I try to avoid SQL Server ... Would you consider using an ADP talking across an fast broadbank link to ... A thin client interface has been suggested, ...
    (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)
  • Re: ORA-12535: TNS:operation timed out errors for over a year now...
    ... 'attach database'. ... At a middle tier - a server sitting between the client and the Oracle ... There is a VPN connection or some type of WAN link between the server ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)
  • Re: Access 2003 to SQL Server 2000 over a VPN
    ... The client runs a VP from Philly to NYC. ... Would you consider using an ADP talking across an fast broadbank link to ... local database, but ideally we would like to centralise. ... the front end over a VPN connection. ...
    (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)

Loading