Re: New to SQL server
- From: "aaron.kempf@xxxxxxxxx" <aaron.kempf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Nov 2006 11:25:38 -0800
Robert
you wouldn't use SQL Server for a strictly local database?
can you read the future?
do you have a PhD in 'I can forecast who can use my COMPANIES data and
WHERE THEY WILL USE IT'?
build everything in SQL Server; mdb is obsolete; eat *** mdb script
kids
-Aaron
Robert Morley wrote:
MS Access can be compared to
using an excel spread***.
Only if you don't know what you're doing.
As the tone of his message implies, this poster is simply trying to start
yet another SQL Server/Access flame war because, like aaron (or maybe he IS
aaron by any other name), in his mind, one of them is a god and the other is
a toy. As Kevin3NF said, they each have their uses. I wouldn't go to the
trouble of using SQL Server for a strictly local database, nor would I even
remotely consider using Access as the back end to a web page. Access also
makes an excellent front end to SQL Server, though it's certainly not the
only possibility.
Rob
.
- References:
- New to SQL server
- From: ironwood9 via AccessMonster.com
- Re: New to SQL server
- From: Kevin3NF
- Re: New to SQL server
- From: Master Programmer
- Re: New to SQL server
- From: Robert Morley
- New to SQL server
- Prev by Date: Re: New to SQL server
- Next by Date: Re: Performance of ODBC
- Previous by thread: Re: New to SQL server
- Next by thread: Re: New to SQL server
- Index(es):