Re: access as frontend to backend sql 2000

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance



Tom: Things changes a little since Access 2002.

You need to purchase the following in order to create an Access 2003 runtime
application:

- Microsoft Access 2003
- Visual Studio Tools for Office 2003 (which includes the Access 2003
Developer Extensions)

The ADE is the product that gives you the license to deploy the 2003 runtime
components and you have to have Access 2003 installed in order to install
the ADE.

If you're using MSDN, note that while VSTO is available in all subscription
levels of MSDN, the Access Developer Extensions are not included with all
versions. ADE is only available at Universal level.

The stand-alone VSTO box includes both VSTO and the ADE.

See http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/office/officetools.aspx for more
details


--
Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
(no private e-mails, please)


"Tom Ellison" <tellison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23Judm5BMGHA.2316@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Al:

I'm glad to have been helpful.

Now, that ADE would be bundled with Visual Studio seems very peculiar.
Also, when I bought a copy of it, it didn't cost nearly $799 by itself.
Something seems wrong about this to me.

Do you already have Access? If so, then I recommend you just purchase ADE
by itself and SQL Server Developer Edition. I don't think that's even
half the $799 put together.

Tom Ellison


"Al Williams" <"atwms AT aol DOT com"> wrote in message
news:e3kRKA%23LGHA.2992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tom,

It appears to be bundled with Visual Studio. The least expensive
approach is Visual Studio Professional which is available elsewhere for
slightly less than the list price of $799 from Microsoft (I don't think
that I would need "team" versions). It just wasn't obvious to me that it
had to be part of Visual Studio and that it might be available either
standalone or in an even less expensive package which was the reason for
the question.

Thank you very much for your answers; they've been a big help!

Al Williams


Tom Ellison wrote:
Dear Al:

You can buy ADE separately, but without Access it would do you little
good. I would call it an "add on" product.

I believe I've seen MSDN from other vendors, but it's a Microsoft
product, and includes what is effectively "prepaid support." So, you'll
be dealing with Microsoft any way you go. (It's not cheap, so it's a
major decision. A bit under $2000 last I remember. It's all the same,
so you may as well shop for it. Support comes from MS no matter from
whom you purchase.) However, if you use 10% of what it comes with,
you'll be light years ahead on price. Also, it includes a download
center for various older version of products. If you distribute a
product, you may need to test it against what all recepients may have,
so this will do you good.

Tom Ellison


"Al Williams" <"atwms AT aol DOT com"> wrote in message
news:ODWyShrLGHA.720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Tom,

Is ADE available as a standalone? I did a search on microsoft.com and
it appears that it is part of Visual Studio. Is there another way to
get it? Or is that what you meant by getting MSDN Universal - includes
ADE?

Do you buy Universal through Microsoft or is it available elsewhere?

Thank you very much for your input.

Al William

Tom Ellison wrote:

Dear Al:

To be technically correct, ADE is an "add on" to Access. You obviously
must have that, too. With that, I've found I don't need anything else.
I do use FMS Enterprise Suite as well. It's not what I'd call an
essential for me, but it has a positive role. As far as what to buy, a
good selection is MSDN Universal. That gives you (and only you) access
to the whole set of Microsoft development tools, licensed for several
computers. You can set up an "imitation" of the entire deployment you
plan, with different OS platforms and different versions of other
software. Testing deployment can be a major part of a complete
project. The project isn't complete until it's deployed. For an
initial deployment this is important, but for an upgraded deployment it
is critical. When users are counting on a system they have been using
for some time, and you're replacing that with a newer version, having
it fail is more critical than having teething trouble with a brand new
deployment that no one is counting on daily.

SQL Server Express may be just the thing for you. Good choice. And,
if it gets too small, you have an easy (though not necessarily
inexpensive) upgrade path. You might also look at Windows Small
Business Server bundled with SQL Server. That's an effective "medium
scale" setup with OS and database combined. It's less expensive
initially and less expensive for adding licenses. That's for the
production side once the project's done, but if you're going to have to
buy it for production, you may as well have it in advance for testing
and for deployment preparations.

Just what you should do depends on the size of the deployment, the
availablility of funds, and your progress along that learning curve.
If you need help, just let me know!

Tom Ellison


"Al Williams" <"atwms AT aol DOT com"> wrote in message
news:OGZsGuqLGHA.2416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Tom,

Some background: I have an backend mdb that contains just over 560MB.
Since it continues to grow as new features are added and even more
data is inserted, I've started to think about going to something that
has more capacity. I understand that a backend's max capacity is 2GB
and that MSDE's is also. So I was thinking about going to SQL Server
2005 Express (4GB) with both Access 2002 and Access 2003 being used by
the users for frontends.

As I've been following some of the newsgroup comments, I've found the
options/suggestions confusing. I'd like to expand my question. Do
you find that you need other tools besides ADE and SQL DE for such an
environment?

I should mention that this is my first database and I just happened to
do one that has become very popular with this organization. So, I'm
on a steep learning curve to keep up with it. Hence my desire to get
some good input. Thanks.

Al Williams


Tom Ellison wrote:


Al Williams:

Access Developer Edition (ADE) includes a license to distribute MSDE
and Access run-time applications to clients without any special
license. It includes tools to create run-time.

SQL Server Developer Edition (SQL DE) includess development tools,
especially Enterprise Manager and Query Analyzer (EM and QA) that are
indispensable. "Don't leave home without it!" (TM) class of
benefits! Improves productivity working with MSDE, and online help
you cannot get along without.

Wow! That endorsement reads like some kind of commercial.

If you don't need distribution to clients without Access installed,
then ADE is optional. If you are going to develop MSDE applications
SQL DE is not optional. It is very inexpensive. It pays for itself
in less than a week.

Tom Ellison


[snip]


Hi Tom,

I would appreciate an explanation of how you use Access Developer
Edition and SQL Server Developer Edition. Will your approach work
with SQL Server 2005 Express? Thanks.

Al Williams


[snip]



--
Al Williams
atwms at aol dot com




--
Al Williams
atwms at aol dot com




.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: access as frontend to backend sql 2000
    ... he needs Visual Studio Tools for Office. ... Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP ... Tom Ellison ... The ADE is the product that gives you the license to deploy the 2003 ...
    (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)
  • Re: access as frontend to backend sql 2000
    ... Tom Ellison ... Developer Extensions) ... The ADE is the product that gives you the license to deploy the 2003 ... SQL Server Express may be just the thing for you. ...
    (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)
  • Re: License issue
    ... However, Microsoft no longer sells it, so you may have ... Developer Extensions) ... The ADE is the product that gives you the license to deploy the 2003 runtime ... The stand-alone VSTO box includes both VSTO and the ADE. ...
    (microsoft.public.access.developers.toolkitode)
  • Re: 17 Minutes With Bill Gates
    ... That is true for you, for me, for Bill Gates, and for the President of the ... If you are a developer, ... It is not possible to be universally popular. ... There are many ways Microsoft can make a very ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: 17 Minutes With Bill Gates
    ... That is true for you, for me, for Bill Gates, and for the ... If you are a developer, ... popular is an outgrowth of this. ... There are many ways Microsoft ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)