Re: Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
- From: "Pat Hartman\(MVP\)" <patsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:19:18 -0500
The Access MDB with linked tables is a superior tool to access SQL Server,
Oracle, DB2, etc. backends. The ADP was extremely limited in its
functionality which is why it never gained wide acceptance. It could only
link to SQL Server tables. It couldn't even link to Access/Jet tables!!!
It also required significantly different techniques to develop applications
such that about the only things an MDB and an ADP have in common is they are
both Access and they both use VBA.
My understanding at the moment is that future development of the ADP will be
limited or non-existent. In fact, with Office 12 which will be released
some time near the end of 2006, the ADP will not be enhanced to allow it to
create tables in SQL Server 2005. It will be able to access tables from
2005 but not create them. So, if you need to use the ADP to create
databases and manage them, you have to stick with SQL Server 2000.
Microsoft plans to continue support for existing ADP but will no longer
support creating them. I don't know what will happen with the upsizing
wizard. I hope it stays so it can be used to create the SQL Server
database. Otherwise, you would need to create the database from scratch or
use a tool such as erWin to translate the Access/Jet schema to SQL Server,
Oracle, DB2, etc.
"Terry M" <terrym@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23mFW4XO$FHA.2520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I just started reading this group and disapointed to read that it sounds
>like ADPs are being hung out to dry.
>
>
> I was not impressed by this. ADPs would allow someone with a bunch of
> Access programming background (like me) to leverage that knowledge to work
> with a SQL Server backend, without learning a new environment. If you
> program in Access you relize there is no faster way to built an
> application.
>
>
> If it is true that going forward less and less functionality, it could be
> hard to justify new development with ADP
>
> Those that have implemented (or plan to) these solutions may have an
> interesting support problem going forward.
>
> However everything I have read is not 'Official' does anyone know the
> status of this, or can you point me in the right direction.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Terry Mc
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
- From: aaron.kempf@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
- From: Terry M
- Re: Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
- From: AlexT
- Re: Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
- References:
- Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
- From: Terry M
- Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
- Prev by Date: Re: Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
- Next by Date: Re: Switching a Form's Recordsource at RunTime to a SP w/ a Parameter
- Previous by thread: Re: Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
- Next by thread: Re: Official Status of SQLServer 2005 ADP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|